People v. Kelly
Appellate Court of Illinois
1DissentJustice Geometer
I believe that defendant’s brief delay in proceeding through the green light at the intersection did not constitute a sufficient basis for the arresting officer to stop defendant’s vehicle. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.
First, I believe that the majority’s conclusion that the investigatory stop in this case was warranted is based on a flawed interpretation of section 11 — 306(a)(1) of the Illinois Vehicle Code (Code) (625 ILCS 5/11 — 306(a)(1) (West 2000)). Section 11 — 306(a)(1) of the Code (625 ILCS 5/11 — 306(a)(1) (West 2000)) is entitled “Traffic-control signal legend” and provides:
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- RL Polk and Co. v. RyanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- People v. LavallierIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. RossAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.