Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Kelly

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 10, 2003No. 2-02-0274Published

1DissentJustice Geometer

I believe that defendant’s brief delay in proceeding through the green light at the intersection did not constitute a sufficient basis for the arresting officer to stop defendant’s vehicle. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.

First, I believe that the majority’s conclusion that the investigatory stop in this case was warranted is based on a flawed interpretation of section 11 — 306(a)(1) of the Illinois Vehicle Code (Code) (625 ILCS 5/11 — 306(a)(1) (West 2000)). Section 11 — 306(a)(1) of the Code (625 ILCS 5/11 — 306(a)(1) (West 2000)) is entitled “Traffic-control signal legend” and provides:

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. RL Polk and Co. v. RyanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. People v. LavallierIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. RossAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API