Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Stallworth v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 8, 2013No. CR-09-1433Published

1ConcurrenceJoiner, Judge

I concur with the main opinion. I write specially to clarify my basis for doing so as to Part VI.B.

In footnote 10, the main opinion states:

“In his response to the State’s motion to dismiss, [Calvin L.] Stallworth identified a juror he believed would not consider a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole. (C. 225.) This Court has repeatedly explained that 1 “ ‘Rule 32.6(b) requires that the petition itself disclose the facts relied upon in seeking relief.’ ” ’ Davis v. State, 44 So.3d 1118, 1124 (Ala.Crim.App.2009) (quoting Boyd v. State, 913 So.2d 1113, 1125…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API