Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Stallworth v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Decided November 8, 2013No. CR-09-1433Published
1ConcurrenceJoiner, Judge
I concur with the main opinion. I write specially to clarify my basis for doing so as to Part VI.B.
In footnote 10, the main opinion states:
“In his response to the State’s motion to dismiss, [Calvin L.] Stallworth identified a juror he believed would not consider a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole. (C. 225.) This Court has repeatedly explained that 1 “ ‘Rule 32.6(b) requires that the petition itself disclose the facts relied upon in seeking relief.’ ” ’ Davis v. State, 44 So.3d 1118, 1124 (Ala.Crim.App.2009) (quoting Boyd v. State, 913 So.2d 1113, 1125…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.