Legal Opinion
Rhodes v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 31, 2007No. Civil Action 06-1840 (EGS)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Robert and Mary Rhodes, proceeding pro se, filed the instant action against the United States alleging misconduct by the United States Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) in the collection of taxes. This case is one of a large number of virtually identical taxpayer lawsuits recently filed by putative pro se litigants in an apparent attempt to flood the federal courts with various boilerplate challenges to actions of the IRS. See Lindsey v. United States, 448 F.Supp 2d 37, 41 n. 3 (D.D.C.2006) (providing a representative sample of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Larry Klayman v. Mark ZuckerbergCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Pollinger v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Marsoun v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Link v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Lykens v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.