Spaulding v. Miller
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtDonegan, J.
At the outset of this case, we are confronted with several motions filed by the parties after the briefs and arguments in the main case had been filed. These motions were ordered sub mitted with the case, lyut, in view of the decision which we reach, it becomes unnecessary to consider them in this opinion.
I. The first error relied upon by appellants for reversal is as follows:
“The court erred in overruling defendants’ motion for directed verdict in that plaintiff’s intestate was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.”
Appellee challenges the right of this court to consider this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sheridan v. LimbrechtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Mueller Lumber Co. v. McCaffreySupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Moore v. PalmerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
- Jahr v. SteffenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- McElfresh v. McElfreshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ackerman Ex Rel. Ackerman v. JamesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- Groves v. City of Webster CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
- Rayburn v. MaherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
- Lotz v. United Food Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1938
- Spaulding v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.