State Ex Rel. Klabacka v. Charles
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
All the parties to this action are in agreement that the proper place for trial of the underlying malpractice action is in Dane county, where the defendants in fact resided at the time of the service of the summons and complaint. The controlling statute is sec. 261.01 (12), Stats., which provides:
“Other Actions. Of any other action, the county in which any defendant resides at the commencement of the action . . . .”
Sec. 261.03, Stats., under which the defendants proceeded, provides:
“Change of venue to proper county. When the county designated in the complaint is not the proper place of trial,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Wisconsin Allied Truck Owners Ass'n v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Huck v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Anderson v. Arpin Hardwood Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Wisconsin Creameries, Inc. v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Maher v. Davis & Starr Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chrysler Financial Co. v. BergstromSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- Aparacor, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Hartwig's Poultry Farm, Inc. v. BundeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Froman v. Keokuk Health Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2008
- Chrysler Financial Co. v. BergstromSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.