Legal Opinion
France v. Apfel
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 13, 2000No. CIV. A. MJG-99-1907PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GRIMM, United States Magistrate Judge.
Carolyn France (“Claimant”) has filed this appeal from the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying her application for Supplemental Security Income benefits (“SSI”). She has exhausted her administrative remedies, and review by this Court is appropriate. The parties have consented to proceed before a magistrate judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Local Rule 301.4. Pending are the cross-motions for summary judgment the parties have filed. (Paper Nos. 10, 11 and 12.) No hearing is necessary,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Ronda S. CRAIG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Huntington v. ApfelDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Crawford v. BarnhartDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Pickard v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2002
- Farnsworth v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2009
- Pickett v. AstrueDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.