Legal Opinion
Bohlmann v. Lindquist
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 16, 1997No. NonePublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] Patrick Bohlmann, a patient at the South Dakota Human Services Center (HSC), appeals the dismissal of his application for a writ of habeas corpus. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Bohlmann was charged with several crimes committed between May 12 and May 30, 1994. 1 Based upon stipulated facts, the trial court found him mentally ill and incapable of knowing the wrongfulness of his actions at the time of the crimes. The trial court further found Bohlmann not guilty by reason of insanity. Bohlmann was therefore acquitted of all charges and committed to the HSC “until such time…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Gene Francis Newby and Raynaldo Barber. Gene Francis Newby (Appellant in No. 92-5711). Raynaldo Barber (Appellant in No. 92-5712)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Sommervold v. GrevlosSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Cowell v. LeapleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. HuftileSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Sioux Falls v. EwoldtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Weins v. SporlederSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Pennington County v. State ex rel. Unified Judicial SystemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. MidgettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Weins v. SporlederSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.