Legal Opinion

Beardsworth v. Whitehead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 24, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Ida Harnden, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Hew York Special Term and-entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Hew York on the-22d day ■ of Hovembef, 1909, directing the said defendant to appear before a referee to continue her testimony.

1Opinion of the Court

Scott, J.:

The parties to this appeal have contrived, whether by intention or not, to convey to the court very little information as to the history or nature of this controversy. It does appear that the plaintiff was, ■in January, 1902, appointed receiver pendente lite of the appellant’s business and bank account. What the nature of the action is, or why a receiver was appointed, is not stated. On October 2, 1905, appellant obtained an order requiring plaintiff to account as receiver and appointing a referee to take and state her account. • She filed no account under this order, but the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Reid Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Aluminum Industries, Inc. v. EganOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Slack v. McAteeNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  4. In re the Estate of MezgerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API