Legal Opinion

Montanez v. Irizarry-Rodriguez

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 19, 1994PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

273 N.J. Super. 276 (1994)

641 A.2d 1079

ANGELINA MONTANEZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

SANTOS IRIZARRY-RODRIGUEZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND CATALDI BUICK DEALERSHIP, GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY, JOHN DOE SUPPLIER, JOHN DOE MANUFACTURER (SUCH NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS AND UNKNOWN), JOINTLY, SEVERALLY, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted January 11, 1994.

Decided May 19, 1994.

Before Judges BRODY, STERN and KEEFE.

Montanez & Montanez, attorneys for appellant (Teofilo Montanez, on the brief).

Bruce M. Resnick, attorney for respondent, Santos…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Burd v. Sussex Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  2. Immer v. RiskoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  3. Merenoff v. MerenoffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  4. Lieberman v. Employers Ins. of WausauSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  5. France v. A. P. A. Transport Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
  2. Stebbins v. RobbinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  3. Frappier v. Eastern Logistics, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  4. Garrett v. MatisaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  5. CAPPS v. DIXONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API