Koeppel v. Issac

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA PETER S. KOEPPEL CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 21-320 HARTFORD ACCIDENT & SECTION “R” (5) INDEMNITY CO. ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is defendant Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company’s (“Hartford”) motion for partial summary judgment on plaintiff’s bad-faith claims under Louisiana Revised Statutes sections 22:1892 and 22:1973.1 Plaintiff Peter Koeppel opposes the motion.2 Because there is no evidence that Harford acted arbitrarily, capriciously, or without probable cause, the Court grants defendant’s partial motion for summary…