Legal Opinion

Adler v. Robson, Miller & Osserman, P. C.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided October 18, 1983PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

David B. Saxe, J.

Is an attorney who orders “daily copy” of court proceedings from a court reporter, for use in the. preparation of his summation, individually responsible for the payment of the cost of transcription?

The facts in this consolidated proceeding are simple: In March of 1983, defendant Robson, Miller & Osserman (RMO) was trial counsel to defendant R. T. Systems, Inc., in an action pending in the Supreme Court, New York County. During the trial, on separate occasions, an attorney from RMO requested that the claimants provide transcript services. The court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bonynge v. . FieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Judson v. . GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  3. In re the Estate of MayNew York Court of Appeals · 1970

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sullivan v. Greene & Zinner, P. C.White Plains City Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API