Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of May
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 14, 1970PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
The appellant, a law printer, was retained by counsel for the attorney of record for the respondents executors to print the record for an appeal prosecuted by them from a judgment in a negligence action. The decedent, and his executors by substitution in the negligence action, were insured and the insurance company, now insolvent, managed the litigation, retained the attorneys, and without consultation with the executors directed the appeal be taken. But the record shows that the interest of the insurance company was not disclosed to the printer and the attorneys did not personally undertake…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bonynge v. . FieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Judson v. . GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Argus Co. v. HotchkissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Reporter Co. v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
3Cited by9 opinions
- McCARTHY v. RECORDEX SERVICE, INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Elisa Dreier Reporting Corp. v. Global NAPs Networks, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Urban Court Reporting, Inc. v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Hambly Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Adler v. Robson, Miller & Osserman, P. C.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.