Legal Opinion

State v. Green

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1993No. 90-1673PublishedCited by 136 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

GUILT PHASE ISSUES

Cross-examination of Coaccused

In her Proposition of Law No. 1, Green argues that the three-judge panel erred in limiting the defense’s cross-examination of Coulter. After direct examination, Green’s counsel cross-examined Coulter about the specifics of *147her pretrial statements to the police. After a cross-examination three times longer than direct, the panel asked if the parties could stipulate that Coulter had made certain prior statements. The parties so stipulated, and the prior statements were then admitted into evidence so the panel could…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. DennisOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API