Spoor-Lasher Co. v. Newburgh Gas & Oil Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The lease contains no express provision as to which of the parties is responsible for taxes. Ordinarily in such case, the law presumes the landlord will pay. When the lease permits the erection of buildings removable by tenant at the end of the term and there is no statement of the kind or cost of the improvements and there is no provision as to taxes, it may be presumed the tenant is to pay the taxes, for it is impossible for the landlord to tell what the burden of the tax is to be and, therefore, he has no basis for rent regulation in that connection. Here (1) at the time the lease was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Hudson River Day Line v. FranckNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Winlock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Appeal of HiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Steinhardt v. BurtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
3Cited by9 opinions
- Black v. General Wiper Supply Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Crewe Corp. v. FeilerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Crewe Corp. v. FeilerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. v. Southern Tier Theatre Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Amoskeag Savings Bank v. Shell Eastern Petroleum Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.