Legal Opinion

Adkins v. Adkins

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 5, 2020No. 4:19-cv-05535Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ARTEMIZ ADKINS, Case No. 19-cv-05535-HSG 8 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR 9 v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES 10 GARRETT ADKINS, Re: Dkt. No. 46 11 Respondent. 12 13 Pending before the Court is the motion for attorneys’ fees filed by Petitioner Artemiz 14 Adkins. Dkt. No. 46. Petitioner seeks a total of $128,524.32 in attorneys’ fees and costs, as well 15 as for additional expenses incurred for the return of her daughter A.F.A. to Switzerland. Id. The 16 Court finds this matter appropriate for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Bluetooth Headset Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Bjorn Michael Rydder v. Susan Marie RydderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  3. Whallon v. LynnCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  4. Cuellar v. JoyceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Souratgar v. FairCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API