Legal Opinion

Winterstein v. Pollard

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1966PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.

Does CPLR 308 (subd. [4]) authorize the court to direct that service be made upon a defendant who resided in New York at the time of the accident by serving the insurance carrier whose name appears on the records of the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles as the insurer under a policy in force on the date of the accident? The Legislature could, of course, have constituted the insurer the agent of the insured for service of process, Milliken v. Meyer (311 U. S. 457, rehearing den. 312 U. S. 712), or even have authorized the bringing of action directly against the insurer. It has not done so.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lerman v. ChurchNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Brodsky v. SpencerNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Perry v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  4. London v. ParsonsNassau County District Court · 1968
  5. Atomic Development & Machine Corp. v. De StefanoAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API