Legal Opinion
People v. Goncalves
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 30, 1997No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s contention that Rosario violations require reversal is without merit. Reversal based upon the People’s delay in disclosing Rosario material is necessary only when defendant demonstrates that he has been substantially prejudiced by the delay (see, People v Martinez, 71 NY2d 937, 940; People v Watson, 213 AD2d 996, 997, lv denied 86 NY2d 804; People v Brantley, 186 AD2d 1036, 1037, lv denied 81 NY2d 785). We conclude that defendant failed to establish that he was substantially prejudiced. He received all of the information he requested in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. MottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. GostonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. BentonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. LluveresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- BENTON, JR., DALE A., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. BentonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013