Legal Opinion

Merchants National Bank v. Curtis

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 27, 1953No. 4186PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.

The question transferred in effect asks us to decide who is entitled to how much of what trust moneys. This question depends in part on whether clause sixth of the will violates the rule against perpetuities. At the threshold of the dispute, however, is the issue whether the construction of this will in the case of In re Harrington Estate, 97 N. H. 184, is res judicata of the present claim that clause sixth violates the rule against perpetuities. We consider this preliminary issue first.

The proponents of the will maintain that the Bean-Quirin interests are precluded from urging the invalidity…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whitesides v. . CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. Golladay v. KnockIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Springfield Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. IrelandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. B. M. C. Durfee Trust Co. v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In re Richardson TrustSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  2. Baker v. McCarthySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  3. Joyner v. DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. C & D INV. CO. v. Gulf Transport Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Hansen v. StroeckerAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API