Legal Opinion

Chinuhuk v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided January 12, 2018No. 2580 A-11574/A-11599/A-11600/A-11716/A-11697PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge MANNHEIMER.

In 2006, the Alaska Legislature amended AS 12.55.125 (the statute that prescribes the sentences for felonies) by adding subsection (o). This new subsection created a special sentencing rule that applied to most defendants convicted of sexual felonies (all except those defendants who are subject to a mandatory term of 99 years' imprisonment).

Under subsection (o), the superior court was required to suspend a specified amount of the defendant's sentence of imprisonment, and to place the defendant on probation for a specified number of years after the defendant finished serving…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Warden v. MarreroSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Brown v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. AuliyeCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2002
  4. Franzen v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Manderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Edward Chinuhuk, Herman Malutin, and Christopher Wasili v. State of Alaska, Edward Chinuhuk, Herman Malutin, and Christopher Wasili v. State of Alaska, Edward Chinuhuk, Herman Malutin, and Christopher Wasili v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Jason D. Ray v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API