Tiscareno v. Anderson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PANEL REHEARING IN PART
CARLOS F. LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Abby and Guillermo Tiscareno seek panel rehearing on both their federal and state claims against Richard Anderson. With respect to the Tiscarenos’ state claim, we GRANT rehearing by the panel. Section IV of the panel’s March 21, 2011, opinion is VACATED and replaced with the order issued herewith. We DENY panel rehearing on all other issues raised in the Tiscarenos’ petition for rehearing.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
In light of the Utah Supreme Court’s decision in Jensen v. Cunningham, 250 P.3d 465 (Utah 2011), we vacated our…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jensen Ex Rel. Jensen v. CunninghamUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Tiscareno v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnson v. City of CheyenneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- Atchison v. City of Tulsa, OklahomaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2025
- Brandon Alan Sherrod v. Javier ChavezDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2026
- Coones v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2026
- Lyman v. Geary County, Kansas, Board of CommissionersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.