Legal Opinion

Tiscareno v. Anderson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 26, 2011No. 09-4238PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PANEL REHEARING IN PART

CARLOS F. LUCERO, Circuit Judge.

Abby and Guillermo Tiscareno seek panel rehearing on both their federal and state claims against Richard Anderson. With respect to the Tiscarenos’ state claim, we GRANT rehearing by the panel. Section IV of the panel’s March 21, 2011, opinion is VACATED and replaced with the order issued herewith. We DENY panel rehearing on all other issues raised in the Tiscarenos’ petition for rehearing.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

In light of the Utah Supreme Court’s decision in Jensen v. Cunningham, 250 P.3d 465 (Utah 2011), we vacated our…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jensen Ex Rel. Jensen v. CunninghamUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Tiscareno v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. City of CheyenneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
  2. Atchison v. City of Tulsa, OklahomaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2025
  3. Brandon Alan Sherrod v. Javier ChavezDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2026
  4. Coones v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2026
  5. Lyman v. Geary County, Kansas, Board of CommissionersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API