Legal Opinion

Atchison v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided August 25, 2025No. 4:21-cv-00286Unknown

1Opinion

Cnited States District Court for the sQorthern District of Oklahoma Case No. 21-cv-286-JDR-SH CoREY ATCHISON, Plaintiff, versus City OF TULSA, OKLAHOMA; ROBERT JACKSON; GARY MEEK; KEN MAKINSON; FRED PARKE; JACK PUTNAM; SCOTT ROGERS; MICHAEL EUBANKS; S M IRWIN; HAROLD WILSON, also known as BEAR WILSON, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Corey Atchison served twenty-eight years in prison for a mur- der he did not commit. He claims that Defendants Robert Jackson, Gary Meek, and Harold Wilson,’ all former Tulsa Police Department officers, vio- lated his constitutional rights by fabricating…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API