Legal Opinion

Parkhurst v. Tabor

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 25, 2009No. 19-1172PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

Ross and Amy Parkhurst, the adoptive father and biological mother of H.P., a minor child, asserted claims as next friend under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Arkansas state prosecutors Stephen Tabor and Daniel Shue, and Sebastian County, Arkansas. The Parkhursts alleged a violation of H.P.’s right to equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment based on Tabor and Shue’s decision to issue a nolle prosequi 1 and forego prosecution of H.P.’s biological father for the felony sexual assault of his daughter. The district court 2 dismissed the case under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Brian Ulrich v. Pope CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  2. ABF Freight System, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. Williams v. HobbsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  4. Lefebure v. D'aquilaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  5. Glenn Gunter v. Farmers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API