Delaney v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
POWELL, Judge.
George Frederick Delaney (“Delaney”) appeals his conviction for petit larceny, in violation of Code § 18.2-96. He contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. As Delaney did not preserve this issue for appeal, we will not consider it as a basis for reversal and, therefore, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. See Rule 5A:18.
“No ruling of the trial court ... will be considered as a basis for reversal unless the objection was stated together with the grounds therefor at the time of the ruling, except for good cause shown or to enable the Court of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Redman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
- Brown v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
- Luck v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
- Howard v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1995
- Grant v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
3Cited by6 opinions
- Scott v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
- Dickerson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
- Alford v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
- Johnson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
- Kerry Lee Winslow v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.