Legal Opinion

Cook v. Blain

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 12, 1932No. 21661PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

“A contract executed on Sunday, and which is connected with or relates to the business or work of the ordinary calling of one of the parties to the contract, and does not relate to work of necessity *693or charity, is invalid and can not be enforced. Penal Code (1910) § 416; Thompson v. Wilkinson, 9 Ga. App. 367 (71 S. E. 678); McAuliffe v. Vaughan, 135 Ga. 852 (70 S. E. 322, 33 L. R. A. (N. S.) 255).” Williams v. Allison, 10 Ga. App. 840 (74 S. E. 442).

Since there was no proof in the instant ease going to show a subsequent ratification of the contract which'…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McAuliffe v. VaughanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  2. Horsley v. WoodleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  3. Dorough v. Equitable Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Thompson v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  5. Williams v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Browne v. SnipesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API