In re Byrd
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, District Judge.
This case is now before the court upon petition of Herbert E. Perkins, assignee of the Kent County Savings Bank, mortgagee, to dismiss the proceedings instituted and prosecuted by Maxwell Hurloclc Byrd under subsection (s) of section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended in 1935 (11 U.S.C.A. § 203 (s). Byrd, the debtor, has answered this petition claiming that the proceedings should not be dismissed, but that he is entitled to the statutory moratorium granted by subsection (s) of section 75 of the act and all of the other rights incident thereto. Hearings have been had,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Borgelt v. BohneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
- In Re BorgeltDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1935
- In Re SchaefferDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1936
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bender v. Federal Farm Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- In re PalmerDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1937
- In Re AndersonDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1938
- In re BrewsterDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1937
- In re N. H. Development Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.