Legal Opinion
In re Palmer
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided October 8, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, District Judge.
Harry D. Palmer, the debtor herein, having heretofore filed in this court his petition for composition and extension under the provisions of subsection (n) of section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended, 11 U. S.C.A. § 203(n), and said petition having heretofore been referred to the proper conciliator, it further appears that on July 23, 1937, at the first meeting of creditors, the debtor made the following proposal to his creditors:
“The undersigned Harry D. Palmer of Ayr in the County of Cass and District aforesaid, the petitioner herein, hereby makes the following…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wright v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust Bank of RoanokeSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Tennessee Publishing Co. v. American National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Borgelt v. BohneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
- Provident Mut. Life Ins. v. University Evangelical Lutheran Church of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- In Re BorgeltDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cowherd v. Phœnix Joint Stock Land BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Bender v. Federal Farm Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- In Re AndersonDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1938
- In re CochraneDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1938