Legal Opinion
M. Fabrikant & Sons, Ltd. v. Fabrikant Fine Diamonds, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 19, 1998No. 98 CIV. 3550 (RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
M. Fabrikant & Sons, Ltd. (“Fabrikant & Sons”), has moved for a preliminary injunction, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to prohibit the defendant, Fabrikant Fine Diamonds, Inc. (“Fabrikant Fine Diamonds”), from using the word “Fabrikant” in advertising unless a first name immediately precedes the last name “Fabrikant” — on the same line, and in the same size, color, type style, and conspicuousness. For the reasons set forth below, Fabrikant & Sons’ motion is granted, and the preliminary injunction is issued.
The Parties
Fabrikant & Sons…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- McGregor-Doniger Inc. v. Drizzle Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Mushroom Makers, Incorporated v. R. G. Barry CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. v. 24/7 Tribeca Fitness, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Johnny's Fine Foods, Inc. v. Johnny's Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2003
- SL&E Training Stable, Inc., Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2008