Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Macko v. Monzula

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1976No. 76-1068PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

E. C. 3501.38(E) prescribes the form for the affidavit of a circulator on petitions presented to a public officer for the purpose of holding an election on any issue. The statute requires that the circulator must state that he witnessed the affixing of every signature, that all signers were to the best of his knowledge and belief qualified to sign, and that every signature is to the best of his knowledge and belief the signature of the person whose signature it purports to be.

*36The affidavits of the circulators on the petitions -filed September 2, 1976, fail to state that to the best of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Barton v. Butler County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Macko v. BryonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  2. MacKo v. ByronDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1983
  3. State Ex Rel. Murray v. Scioto County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. MacKo v. ByronDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1982
  5. State ex rel. Van de Kerkhoff v. DowlingOhio Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API