Legal Opinion

Stetson v. Cook

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1878PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Calhoun. Bill to quiet title. Defendant Cook appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

Complainant filed his bill to have a cloud *752upon certain real estate which he claimed to own in fee, removed.

It is clear that defendant Cook In 1855 purchased the lands in question, with other lands, from one "Watson, and that the conveyance thereof was properly recorded in the county where these lands are situate on the 20th day of February of that year. The premises were afterwards sold by Cook to third parties who entered into possession thereof and made improvements thereon, but being unable to pay the consideration as agreed, the lands passed back, and the title thereto, to defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Willcox v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Larscheid v. KittellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Gluck v. Rynda Development Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  3. Badger Gold Min. & Mill. Co. v. Stockton Gold & Copper Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1905
  4. Kamman v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Oliver v. SanbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API