Legal Opinion
United States v. Gerald Wiedyk
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 2, 1996No. 94-2342PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Gerald Michael Wiedyk appeals his conviction for receiving kickbacks in his capacity as an officer of an employee benefit plan and for making false statements in relation to documents required by the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1954, 1027. Defendant argues that the trial judge erred in admitting prejudicial hearsay and in failing to grant a mistrial based on prosecutorial misconduct. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the District Court.
I. Facts
Defendant left his job at National Health Labs…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Viereck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Timothy Wayne Morrow (89-5418/5708) and George Mooneyham (89-5710)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- John W. Byrd, Jr. v. Terry L. Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Chucks EmuegbunamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Morales v. American Honda Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. John M. Logan (99-6176) Alan Michael Laws(99-6198)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.