Legal Opinion

McGee v. Humboldt County School District

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1977No. 8238PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant brought suit against respondent for its alleged unlawful failure to renew her teaching contract. The district court granted respondent’s motion for summary judgment and denied appellant’s motion for partial summary judgment. Appellant here contends (1) she was a post-probationary teacher and therefore entitled to the procedural mandates of NRS 391.111 to 391.3196, and (2) her proprietary and liberty interests were impaired without due process. We disagree.

1. Pursuant to statutes then in force, the procedures of NRS 391.111 to 391.3196, concerning the dismissal of or refusal…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Richardson v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Spicer v. Anchorage Independent School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1966

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Picogna v. Board of Education of Township of Cherry HillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. Cain v. McQueenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. Eureka County School District Board of Trustees v. HolboNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Virginia Cain v. Robert McQueen Virginia Cain, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Robert McQueen Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Virginia Cain v. Robert McQueenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API