Legal Opinion

Cain v. McQueen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 24, 1978No. Nos. 76-1222, 76-1387 and 76-1439PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRASK, Circuit Judge:

This appeal is taken by both plaintiff and defendants from an order of the district court denying defendants’ motion to dismiss and granting limited summary judgment to plaintiff. Plaintiff’s subsequent motion to amend the limited summary judgment pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure was denied.

Jurisdiction in the district court was based upon 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3), (4). Appellant in her amended complaint also alleged that the defendant-trustees violated her rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Dr. Joseph T. Skehan v. Board of Trustees of Bloomsburg State CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  5. Jeroyd W. Greene v. Howard University, a Corporation, Nathan Hare v. Howard University, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spinelli v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  2. Brady v. GebbieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. E. Robert Corrigan v. Edward T. DonilonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  4. Virginia Cain v. Robert McQueen Virginia Cain, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Robert McQueen Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Virginia Cain v. Robert McQueenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. Webster v. Board of Trustees of School District No. 25Idaho Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API