Legal Opinion

HLO BY LEO v. Hossle

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 19, 1986No. 85-575PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UHLENHOPP, Justice.

The principal legal issue in this appeal is whether the tort of intentional infliction of extreme emotional distress arises in favor of individuals who were not present at the time of the incidents in question.

Plaintiffs L.E.O. and R.O. are the parents of H.L.O., M.A.O., B.L.O., and R.S.O. At the time of the events in question L.E.O. and R.O. were husband and wife. Subsequently their marriage was dissolved', and L.E.O. thereafter had custody of the children. We will refer to this family by the fictitious name of Oscar. Plaintiff T.L.S. is the mother and custodian of A.S. We…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Harsha v. State Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  2. Barnhill v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  3. Dunn v. Rose Way, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  4. Blakeley v. Estate of ShortalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  5. Bennight v. Western Auto Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Marlene F. v. Affiliated Psychiatric Medical Clinic, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Courtney v. CourtneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Nancy P. v. D'AMATOMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. Maguire v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. R.D. v. W.H.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API