Legal Opinion

People v. Gonzalez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 20, 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in failing to give an identification charge is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hattan, 149 AD2d 531) and, under the circumstances of this case, we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (cf., People v Chandler, 120 AD2d 542).

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in summarily denying the defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment of conviction. Many of the defendant’s allegations with respect to the claimed ineffectiveness of his trial counsel were based…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SatterfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. People v. ChandlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. People v. HattanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Garcia v. ScullyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  2. People v. AlcockNew York Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. MaisonetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. People v. VonwerneCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API