Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sanofi-Aventis v. Apotex Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 18, 2011No. 2011-1048Published

1DissentNewman, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent from Part I of the court’s opinion, which reverses the district court’s award of prejudgment interest on the agreed conditional damages. The May 2006 Agreement did not alter the general rule that prejudgment interest is awarded on damages for patent infringement. The general rule does not depend on whether damages are measured by the amount of lost profits, or as a royalty on infringing sales, or, as here, an agreed percentage of sales. Thus, to make the injured party whole, interest is paid on the monetary loss. The district court correctly so recognized. The district…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Greenfield v. Philles Records, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Paper Converting MacHine Company v. Magna-Graphics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Central Soya Company, Inc. v. Geo. A. Hormel & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. The Gyromat Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Champion Spark Plug Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API