State v. Allen
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1ConcurrenceBonin, J.
lil write additionally and separately1 to call attention to the concern that this defendant, and likely many others like him, will never have the benefit of a meaningful judicial review of his claim of an unconstitutionally excessive sentence, a sentence which is proscribed by the Eighth Amendment and Louisiana Const, art. I, § 20. Mr. Allen’s sentence is presumptively constitutional. State v. Johnson, 97-1906, pp. 5-6 (La.3/4/98), 709 So.2d 672, 675. But no sentence is per se constitutional. Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277, 290, 103 S.Ct. 3001, 77 L.Ed.2d 637 (1983).
Superficially at least, Mr.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Melinie v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.