Legal Opinion
In Re Merz
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 13, 1930No. 103PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
37 F.2d 1 (1930)
In re MERZ.
DEGENER et al.
v.
BOYD.
No. 103.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
January 13, 1930.
Spencer, Ordway & Wierum, of New York City (Otto C. Wierum, of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.
David W. Kahn, of New York City, for appellee.
Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).
Auffmordt & Co. contend (a) that they were at all times in possession of the merchandise upon which Merz had agreed to give a lien; (b) that, even if the possession was in Merz, such possession was in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Casey v. CavarocSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Security Warehousing Co. v. HandSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Steele v. . BenhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Fourth St. Nat. Bank v. Millbourne Mills Co.'s TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
- Siedenbach v. . RileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Miller v. Wells Fargo Bank International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Clarkson Co. Ltd. v. ShaheenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Singer Products Co. v. First American Bank of New York (In Re Singer Products Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- Swetnam v. Edmund Wright Ginsberg Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- In Re Wyoming Valley Collieries Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.