Johnson v. Toro Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice.
Toro Company seeks review of a decision of a divided Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals holding, contrary to the determination of the compensation judge, that an injury sustained by employee Carol Johnson arose out of and in the course of her employment. We affirm.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. Since 1951, with the exception of a few years, Toro sponsored a dinner for its employees and retired employees shortly before Christmas and also distributed turkeys to its employees. Each employee who was working would receive an envelope containing his paycheck and a computer…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goff v. Farmers Union Accounting Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Merrill v. J. C. PenneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Ethen v. Franklin Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Ramaker v. Marjae, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Pasko v. BEECHER COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
3Cited by4 opinions
- INA of Texas v. BryantTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- St. Anthony Hospital v. JamesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- INA of Texas v. BryantTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- INA of Texas v. BryantTexas Supreme Court · 1985