Legal Opinion

United States v. Mahoney

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 5, 1980No. Crim. 79-223PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOSEPH S. LORD, III, Chief Judge.

Defendant has moved for disclosure of all grand jury transcripts and for dismissal of the superseding indictment. Two grand juries heard evidence in this case. The first grand jury heard testimony and subpoenaed documents without returning an indictment. The second grand jury, empanelled June 29, 1979, handed down the original indictment on October 5, 1979 and a superseding indictment on November 30,1979. The defendant moves under Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e) 1 for disclosure of all the transcripts of all proceedings before all grand juries that heard evidence in…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. HolmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. United States v. BoffaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
  3. United States v. Deerfield Specialty Papers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. United States v. GattoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
  5. United States v. RastelliDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API