Legal Opinion

State v. Norman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 11, 1984No. C82-07-36456; CA A28001PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance (heroin). ORS 475.992. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized during a warrantless search of his person. The issue is whether the police had probable cause to arrest defendant before he was searched. Defendant concedes that if the arrest was valid the search incident to that arrest was valid. He has not raised any issue regarding the search per se. We affirm.

The facts are not disputed. Officer Wong testified that, while in a marked police car with another uniformed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. PonceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  3. State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. State v. MuckleroyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. State v. CordrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. State v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. State v. SteinkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API