Legal Opinion

Heimerl v. Lindley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1980No. 79-1619PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

R. C. 5711.18 provides, in part, as follows: “ * * * In the case of personal property used in business, the book value thereof less book depreciation at such time shall be listed, and such depreciated book value shall be taken as the true value of such property, unless the assessor finds that such depreciated book value is greater or less than the then true value of such property in money.”

The duty of the Tax Commissioner in listing and assessing personal property for taxation pursuant to R. C. Chapter 5711 is to arrive at the true value in money of such property. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Conalco, Inc. v. Monroe County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Grabler Manufacturing Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Gahanna Heights, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. St. Bernard Self-Storage, L.L.C. v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Buckeye Terminals, L.L.C. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Bedford Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Tele-Media Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Remington Clean Fill, L.L.C. v. Milford Exempted Village Schools Bd. of Edn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API