Glorioso v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEARS, Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction for possession of less than 28 grams of a controlled substance, heroin. Appellant entered a plea of not guilty. He was found guilty by a jury and his punishment, enhanced by two prior felony convictions, was assessed at ninety-nine years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. We affirm.
Appellant was a passenger in a car stopped for a traffic offense. The driver was not able to produce a driver’s license or proof of insurance and one of the police officers recognized Appellant and knew he had an outstanding traffic warrant.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Ex Parte BurnsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Ex Parte WilsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- McGuire v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- Glorioso v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Glorioso v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
- State v. David Williams, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002