Glorioso v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEARS, Justice.
This case is before us on remand from the Court of Criminal Appeals. Glorioso v. State, 746 S.W.2d 483 (Tex.Crim.App.1988). The mandate calls for us to reconsider Appellant’s fifth point of error in light of Jones v. State, 711 S.W.2d 634 (Tex.Crim. App.1986).
In his fifth point of error, Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to prove the finality of one of the prior convictions alleged for enhancement. He asserts that State’s Exhibit 32, which contains the notation that Appellant’s appeal in Cause No. 354,405 was final, was never introduced into evidence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Diremiggio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Ex Parte GonzalesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Foster v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990