Legal Opinion

Brew v. Cochran

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 11, 1905No. 11PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. On demurrer to bill.

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, District Judge.

The plaintiff’s intestate, George W.. Jackson, was a member of the copartnership of Jackson, Hastings & Co., organized August 31, 1897, to engage in the general banking business at Bellefonte, Pa. Two months later, on October 22, he died; and Henry C. McCormick and Daniel H. Hastings two other members have also-died since then, the one in May, 1902, and the other in January, 1903, leaving J. Henry Cochran as the sole survivor. As recited in the co-partnership agreement, Jackson had a six-fifteenths interest in the business, Hastings had five-fifteenths,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Denver v. RoaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Brew v. HastingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Brew v. HastingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gilbert v. FontaineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API