Legal Opinion

Herzfeld-Phillipson Co. v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

It is. clear that, if the appellant became the owner of the goods as of May 1st, it was legally liable for the taxes levied pursuant to assessment as of May 1st. Day v. Pelican, 94 Wis. 503, 513, 69 N. W. 368.

It is claimed by counsel for' respondent that the title to the goods passed to the appellant on the 1st day of May by *434the acceptance of its. bid, or at least that it acquired an equitable interest on that day, and that on the confirmation of the sale by the referee the title related back to the time when the bid was made. There are authorities to the effect that the relation of a bidder…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Michigan Central Railroad v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Day v. Town of PelicanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Bratton v. Town of JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  5. State ex rel. Foster v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hermann v. Town of DelavanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. Board of Review of Village of GreendaleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  3. Pelican Amusement Co. v. Town of PelicanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Milwaukee County v. DorsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Town of Amnicon v. KimmesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API