Bratton v. Town of Johnson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Marathon County. . The case is stated in the opinion. To the point that an act repealing or modifying a remedy does not af-feet pending actions, they cited, in addition to cases, referred to in the opinion, Oaldand v. Whiffle, 44 Cal. 303; Gorsuth v. Butterfield, 2 Wis. 237; Bailey v. Mogg, 4 Denio, 60; Sedg. Stat. & Const. Law, 132; Knox v. Baldwin, 80 N. Y. 610; JDanforth v. Smith, 23 Yt. 247.
1Opinion of the CourtOetoN, J.
This action is brought to cancel and set aside the taxes assessed on plaintiffs’ lands in the town of Johnson in Marathon county, in the jtear 1888, and to restrain the said town and John Buchner, the treasurer thereof, from returning as delinquent said taxes. The plaintiff alleges in his complaint that his said lands were assessed in said town in said year by the assessors of said town, and that taxes were duly levied, extended, and apportioned upon such assessment; that there were wide differences in the quality, value, character, and situation of the lands liable to taxation in said town…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brandeis v. NeustadtlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- Dillon v. LinderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- Baldwin v. ElyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- State ex rel. Smith v. GaylordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- Cramer v. StoneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hermann v. Town of DelavanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Village of Westby v. BekkedalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Jackson County Iron Co. v. MusolfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- Lands' End, Inc. v. City of DodgevilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- Wisconsin Central Railroad v. Ashland CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.