Legal Opinion

United States v. Carroll

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 29, 1971No. 23,339PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused contends that he was prejudiced in regard to the sentence by certain actions of the military judge.

Initially charged with assault with intent to commit murder, the accused agreed with the convening authority before trial to enter a plea of guilty to the lesser offense of assault with intentional infliction of grievous bodily harm, in violation of Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 928. The agreement contained no provision as to sentence.1 At the accused’s request, he was tried by a military judge, sitting without court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. MamaluyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  4. United States v. MontgomeryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  5. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. MartinezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. GarzaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  3. United States v. PaulinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  4. United States v. CaroU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
  5. United States v. HardyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API