Commonwealth v. Graham
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
STABILE, J.:
Appellant, David Karl Graham, appeals from the January 14, 2014 order denying Appellant’s pretrial motion to dismiss all charges against him. Appellant argues the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution bars retrial because the prosecutor’s misconduct during Appellant’s first trial resulted in mistrial.1 After review, we affirm.
This prosecution commenced on November 16, 2011 when police filed a criminal complaint charging Appellant with 12 counts of aggravated indecent assault, 12 counts of indecent assault, and one count of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. HairstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. KearnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. ChmielSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Com. v. Sanchez, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Commonwealth v. LynnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. ByrdSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Commonwealth v. BaldwinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.