Legal Opinion

BIESECKER v. PA ATTORNEYS GENERAL

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 28, 2021No. 5:21-cv-00649Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANGELA BIESECKER, : : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 21-649 : v. : : PA ATTORNEYS GENERAL; PA : MEDICAL FRAUD UNIT; PA : DEPARTMENT HUMAN SERVICES; : CEREBRAL PALSY OF CHESTER : COUNTY; BERKS COUNTY PUBLIC : DEFENDER; CHRISTIAN : SONDERGAARD; ELIZABETH : MADIGAN; and BERKS COUNTY : COMMON PLEAS COURT, PRESIDENT : JUDGE PARISI, : : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM OPINION Smith, J. May 28, 2021 The pro se plaintiff has sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API