Legal Opinion
Estate of Hage v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 3, 2009No. 91-1470LPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
SMITH, Senior Judge:
On June 6, 2008, the Court issued an Opinion resolving the final remaining issue in this long-standing case: whether the Government’s actions amounted to a taking under the Fifth Amendment and, if so, the amount of just compensation due to Plaintiffs. See Hage v. United States, 82 Fed.Cl. 202, 203 (2006). In its latest Opinion,1 the Court found that the Government’s action was indeed a taking under the Fifth Amendment and awarded Plaintiffs “$2,854,816.20 for the value of their water rights, plus $1,365,615.00 for the value of [range] improvements, for a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Ammex, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Vernon F. Minton v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. And the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Griswold v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Ammex, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- The Estate of E. Wayne Hage and the Estate of Jean N. Hage v. the United States 9United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013